LORD DAVID BLUNKETT
Incredibly, for carrying out one of the most blatant human rights offences against the British citizens, probably one of the worst instances since the Second World War, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth's governments allowed the then David Blunkett MP to tear up the European Convention of Human Rights and our own version of Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, by allowing this politician to mastermind the Sexual Offences Act 2003, an Act that reversed the burden of proof in that anyone accused of a sexual offence enters a Court presumed guilty, instead of presumed innocent. You may be thinking that how perverse this law is, in contrast to, and why it might have been that he cavorted unashamedly (until found out) with more than one associate during his time, after which he resigned. How is it then that this repeat offender came to be given the task of re-drafting an Act as important as the Sexual Offences Act 2003, when his morals were demonstrably shot to bits?
Not only were his morals questionable, but that made him vulnerable to suggestions from women who were prepared to have sex with him. You may be thinking if there was more than one that were discovered, might there be others that were kept secret! How then was he made a peer?
PHONE TAPPING - Mr Blunkett, 66, left the messages on the phone of friend Sally Anderson, then 29, with whom he has denied having a relationship. A tape of his outbursts was found at the home of the NOTW’s private eye Glenn Mulcaire, 43.
Mr Blunkett told Ms Anderson: “Someone very, very close has done a really phenomenal piece of work on destroying both our lives at this moment in time and it’s vile. “Whoever it is I hope they rot in Hell.” He added: “They’re real b*****ds, they’ve done it for money and they’ve done it for themselves and the world stinks.” Mr Blunkett later admitted to a three-year affair with married magazine publisher Kimberly Quinn, 52.
DAILY MAIL DECEMBER 2004
- Second mistress threat to Blunkett
'David understands it was all a bit messy'
- But the affair with Ms Maguire lasted just five months. She moved out of the home she shared with Mr Hurdle, although they have since reunited and now have a two-year-old daughter. After consulting Mr Blunkett, one of his close friends said last night: "I do not deny David had a relationship with this person. She was with Mr Hurdle, they had been together for a while then she went to work in David's office and they hit it off immediately.
On the one hand we fight to preserve the freedoms that make us human and on the other hand British politicians seek to take away those rights, but only after the justification for war has died down so that abuses on the person by the state will not be so noticeable. But surely that social creep is what led us to war against a Germany that had become so twisted in its thinking that it had to be stopped. Let us not forget that is was England that invented concentration camps, and eugenics programs were popular in the US as part of their American Way agenda long before Adolf and Heinrich applied mass production techniques to the ideology, or rather elimination agenda, as witnessed by Auschwitz, Buchenwald and Dachau extermination camps - now shrines to the depths of human depravity.
DAILY MAIL FEB 2010
- 'I did something very wrong': David Blunkett's mistress Kimberly Quinn admits remorse over three-year affair.
Blunkett was the minister responsible for overseeing the drafting of legislation that allowed a jury to convict anyone, most usually a man accused by a woman of rape or other sexual assault, without any physical or factual proof of an offence being committed.
In all other cases the Judge has a duty to warn a Jury of the dangers of convicting someone oN just the say so of the person accusing him or her. In other words we have a Witch Hunt situation where (for example) a Bunny Boiler who is out for revenge for being dumped can get their ex-partners locked up just by learning a few key phrases from looking at reports on other cases.
Imagine that you are a parent who does not let your child have their own way. Using this Act any child can make a false allegation against their father or mother, or most typically against a step-father who rescues a dysfunctional single parent family for a time, and get that person jailed.
Simply because there is no evidence needed for a conviction, just a modicum of acting ability, where social services will usually lend a hand and coach the claimant even though that is illegal - and the police will not seal up the crime scene but allow an accuser time to fabricate a better story and hide inconvenient evidence from the police, not that the police would disclose that until the very last minute in any case.
GOVERNMENT HEALTH WARNINGS
In cases where a man is considering dating a single parent mother, there should be warnings for men and a social analysis of the stability or otherwise of the women and children, such that men considering embarking on such as relationship might at least be warned as to the possibility that in the event that there is a break up, that he should keep a diary, documentary, audio and if possible video evidence to protect himself from any accusation involving illegal sexual activity with a child.
Remember, that no evidence at all is required for the State to gain a conviction and ruin the man's life thereafter.
In the UK there is no right of appeal. There are also Legal Aid cuts, such that a robust defence will be impossible to mount unless the bloke has independent means.
A conviction means signing a register for at least 10 years. The European Courts will do their best to defeat an application and frequently disqualify an application to the Human Rights Court on the basis that there is a domestic remedy - when in fact there is no Article 13 in the British Human Rights Act 1998.
You may care to agree, that such lack of safeguards is tantamount to another Eugenics agenda. The Criminal Cases Review Commission are held to be unfit for purpose, but that is the only way back to the Court of Appeal for innocent victims of a wrongful conviction and subsequent detention.
SINGLE PARENT TRAP
Women who are single parents will typically go all out to trap a man, where they would otherwise be less desperate. The danger is the children, rather than the mother. But in the current climate single mothers can be extremely dangerous, concocting any story for revenge, in an effort to make the man stay, should things become abusive for example. And they frequently do. But it is the female who becomes abusive in cases where the male can no longer take the pressures being applied.
We imagine you might be thinking that Lord Blunkett overlooked the failings of the system he was responsible for creating, as he bent over backwards to impress his female staff. Indeed, we wonder who actually drafted the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Perhaps someone can enlighten us on that one? Was it David Blunkett, his civil servants, and what was the ratio of males to females involved in the drafting procedure.
We recommend that any male who is at risk of being alone with any children, should have cameras monitoring the situation when they are in any room alone with a child.
ADOPTIONS & SOCIETAL COST
In view of the cost of finding homes for abandoned children, the State may like to consider making it a criminal offence for a women to entrap a man using pregnancy as a weapon in seeking to cement a relationship that is actually a one night stand where a bloke as been duped. In such cases abortion should be considered, if the male is able to say that he was fooled into thinking he was having safe (protected) casual sex. It is the reverse of date rape.
Money spent on prevention might be a safer investment than the Bedroom Tax, and other Draconian measures that drove so many unfortunates to suicide.
Why is it that the tax payer gets lumbered with paying up to £500 a week to house a child with no parents. It is the natural parents who should pay when they are able. if they cannot pay because there are no jobs, they should be forced to do community service or other unpaid work until they find work to be able to contribute.
Doctors should be on the lookout for pregnancies where there is no father and report such cases to the police for investigation. If the woman has entrapped the man, she should be prosecuted and if found guilty, be forced to sign a register such that potential male partners might be able to check on who they are thinking of sleeping with. It would be beneficial if there was a smartphone app that could carry out such checks, instantly, based on fingerprint, voice, or facial recognition software.
Then there is the single judge situation that filters appeal applications (because there is no right of appeal in Nazi Britain) and the Criminal Cases Review Commission who's job it is to whitewash as many cases of wrongful conviction as possible to keep the British Justice system appearing to be safe, when in fact it is riddled with Masonic Judges and Prosecutors in the CPS. Hence, if you are dating the daughter of a Mason as in one case that has come to our attention, watch out if the relationship, dare we say engagement is cancelled. This is because Masonic influence goes all the way up the chain to the Court of Appeal, or indeed any Court along the path - if you are trying to correct an injustice.
Once released from prison, if you are lucky enough to get our, that is not the end of the injustice, like the guards in the prisoner of war camps who gassed their Jewish captives in special chambers designed for mass murder, there is the Probation Service to deal with and the Sex Offenders Register that emasculates anyone so entrapped - in the continuance of this state sanctioned eugenics programme that violates Article 3 and 17 - and you should note that in Gestapo Britain there is no Article 13 effective remedy available to anyone - because Article 13 was carefully left out of our domestic Human Rights Act.
It would be funny if it was not so shameful. Like when Harriet Harman recently made that disgusting joke on live BBC TV about getting 99 Jews in the ashtray of a car. Britain is quite prepared to let innocent men rot in prison along with those with IPP sentences who were long overdue for release and rehabilitation. Lord Blunket appears to show no remorse for his part in creating this situation, much the same as Tony Blair sought to justify invading Iraq on defective intelligence of the basis that he did not agree with their regime. Sounds a bit like Hitler invading Poland to us.
Prison officers and governors are more than happy to carry out the wishes of the State, regardless of the inhumanity. Indeed, many of them appear to take some kind of sadistic pleasure in what they do, we suppose like many Nazi war criminals who claimed that they were only following orders.
To our mind this is nothing short of the sort of statute crafting that saw Adolf Hitler and his chum Heinrich Himmler form the Gestapo and wipe out millions of political adversaries in work camps on their way to invading Poland in the quest to stamp a Third Reich on the face of planet earth.
SEPTEMBER 2017 - THOUSANDS OF IPP PRISONERS TRAPPED
IN SHAMEFUL LIMBO
The majority of those had tariffs of four years or less, which in itself showed that the offences were not on the scale of seriousness that IPPs were supposedly brought in for. The plight of James Ward, who has served 11 years in jail after initially being sentenced with an IPP to a minimum of 10 months for
arson in 2006, is just the latest case to be highlighted – he is now due to be released. Today, seven years after IPPs were abolished, about 3,300 IPP prisoners remain behind bars, not knowing when they will be released.
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions May 2005 - Nov 2005
Member for Sheffield, Brightside and Hillsborough May 2010 - Mar 2015
The Labour party is a political group that has had its share of Prime Ministers in the United Kingdom, but even with that balance of the power sharing seesaw, this party has been unable to curb climate change, provide affordable housing or bring down our National Debt to sensible levels. The policies of Conservative and Labour parties - and even for a brief time a coalition with the Liberal Democrats have done nothing to alleviate the poverty trap for millions of British citizens who are effectively, financial slaves.
The United Kingdom has many political parties, some of which are represented in the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Below are links to the websites of the political parties that were represented in the House of Commons after the 2015 General Election:
LABOUR SHADOW GOVERNMENT 2017-2018
Baroness Sharmi Chakrabarti CBE
Baroness Angela Smith of Basildon
Keir Starmer KCB QC
Lord Steven Bassam of Brighton
We are concerned with how the make up of the above parties and (reasonably) popular policies affects the Wealden district of Sussex, because we are all brothers on two islands in the Atlantic Ocean and what we do or fail to do is likely to rebound on ourselves and our fellow man in other nations around the world. How we act today influences policies in other countries in our global community. It is not just about us and our patch even with Brexit putting the brakes on.
East Sussex has five District and Borough Councils, each with a border on the coast. From west to east they are:
There is also East Sussex County Council as the provider of services to the 5 East Sussex districts.
As near neighbours and with councils now sharing facilities and working together, these area of Sussex are included in our remit and an area where climate change and affordable housing are issues that need urgent attention. Where the coastline is a feature in every Council, Blue Growth is a food security issue, especially where this side of of our local economy is under-exploited.
LABOUR PARTY MEMBERSHIP HAS RISEN SINCE THE BREXIT REFERENDUM 2016