Huw Andrews is a director of Lime Park Estate Limited. He is thought to have been in communication with Wealden District Council about the old generating buildings in Lime Park in connection with denying the occupier a reasonable and beneficial use, where the generating buildings are of considerable local historic interest and should be preserved for the enjoyment of future generations.
He is also known to have (at first) tried to deny access to adjoining land for essential maintenance purposes, but subsequently been reasonable for which the affected persons or organizations are most grateful.
Every person owes every other person a general duty of care, and in the case of a local authority, it is incumbent on them to seek to protect historic assets in England, not to mask the truth to pervert the course of justice in a general conspiracy to cause financial harm. That would of course be illegal.
WILLFUL NEGLIGENCE & WANTON ABANDONMENT
Vandalism takes many forms. If any person willfully prevents preservation works, or even simply neglects to properly maintain land in the knowledge that shrubs and plants will cause damage if left untended, that level of wanton neglect could constitute vandalism in failing to perform a duty, just as much as if the perpetrators were physically removing lead from a church roof in the sure knowledge that such as act would lead to decay of the fabric of a building. Sometimes not performing a duty (failing to act with due diligence) is just as devastating as doing something to cause harm. If such behaviour persists, your only remedy might be to seek the assistance of the County Court with an application under the Access to Neighbouring Land Act 1992.
In failing to mention the generating origins of the historic asset in Lime Park to Wealden District Council, any person staying silent as to their local knowledge would be sending clear signals to a corrupted council such as Wealden to carry on as if there was no asset to protect. Hence, if the residents in Lime Park had fully shared their knowledge of the history attaching to the generating works, it is doubtful that Wealden would have been able to carry on with their vendetta against Mr Kruschandl, let alone lie to Inspectors Dannreuther and Michael, and of course the Crown Court, Justice Steele and Dame Butler-Sloss.
It appears that in locals staying silent as to the facts (neglecting their duty of care), all of the council's guns remained trained on Mr Kruschandl, targeting him not for the good works he was doing, but because Wealden thought that they could single out members of the public that the establishment did not favour as targets to remove from their administrative area, despite Article 14 protections against institutionalised discrimination that should be afforded to every citizen regardless of status as a basic human right.
This general duty extended to every person in Herstmonceux village who might have had knowledge of the electricity generating history attaching to (at that time) the derelict buildings in Lime Park, with particular emphasis on the failures of the Parish Council to conduct proper searches and enquiries of local historians. Though it is suspected that many local councillors knew about the historic asset on their doorstep and again, simply remained silent.
HOUSE TRAINING COUNCILS - Making councils obey the law of the land is incredibly difficult where institutionalized discrimination is rife and there are too many vested interests for them to be able to see clearly do the right thing. We need then to look at how we train animals not to foul our houses, for guidance on how to treat officers and member councillors who are well versed in controlling development to suit their pockets and appease affected residents, rather than protect historic assets. Protecting archaeological remains is expensive, that is why councils allow our heritage to rot away. It is disgraceful behaviour on their part, and that includes any person who aids and abets a council for their own personal gain.
Lime Park Estates Limited was set up in March of 1985 by some of the residents in Lime Park, as company number 01893712 expressly to take over management of a shared access.
According to companies house this is a 'residents' property management company, code: 98000. But that may not be strictly accurate, where many of the occupiers in the Park are not represented and this company works against the interests of some of those who are not represented to cause loss (or potential loss) contrary to the Fraud Act 2006.
Whereas, any company purporting to manage a shared drive exists to ensure that such access is secured for all. In this case there are two ways of accessing the shared drive, one of which is not properly being maintained.
FLUSHED WITH SUCCESS - We imagine that Wealden would have been overjoyed in duping the High Court into making an Order that demanded removal of toilet facilities from their long-term adversary's home, condemning him to defecate in the old fashioned way - and remarkable is it not how well an animal can adapt and build from sheer determination until it is time to reveal the truth and his gleaming new urinals. The building has toilets re-fitted of course thanks to Dame Butler-Sloss and the occupiers rejoice with each pull of the handle, at the resourcefulness of this underdog when the chips were down. The frivolity at Wealden's offices was short lived when the Health & Safety Executive chimed in to spend a penny or two. From that point on Wealden have been bogged down with the publication of what they had done - and permanent skidmarks in the underpants of their hall of shame. No amount of toilet tissue can ever wipe the brown from this council's back passages.
You may feel ashamed of your own failure to act, or the actions of your council at being found out for the deception orchestrated by this council's legal officers as to the history of the Generating Works at Herstmonceux in 1986/7. Imagine then the challenge in getting this council and local developers to act on climate change We are all doomed!
The deception that led to this Council spending enormous sums trying to bury Mr Kruschandl was begun by George Morham White, Richard Mercer and Thomas Hoy who gave evidence - denying the building was a historic asset in 1987. The deception was continued by Douglas Moss, Ian Kay, Christine Nuttall, David Phillips and Victorio Scarpa into the year 2000 and the deception is maintained today by Charles Lant, Trevor Scott and others yet to be identified, where Kelvin Williams appears to have been put out to pasture.
LINKS & REFERENCE
FARMING - The backbone of any society is the production of food to feed the population, though these days much of what we eat is imported from other producers, such as fish farmed in Asia. We can no longer find enough fish locally having exhausted our fisheries. Agriculture is also changing where we have drained the soil for so long with artificial fertilizers that yields will fall, meaning a shift to obtaining protein from the sea - but unfortunately we are disposing of around 8 millions tons of plastic in our seas - poisoning marine life that we need to keep us nourished. Food security is therefore high on the United Nations agenda via the Food and Agriculture Organization.