A WRITTEN CONSTITUTION

 

THE PRESENT BRITISH SYSTEM OF JUSTICE IS OPEN TO WIDESPREAD HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES

Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site

 

 

THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY UK, ENGLAND, NORTHERN IRELAND, SCOTLAND & WALES

 

 

NOW IS THE TIME FOR CHANGE - Under the present system where the Head of State is a royal, and there is no written constitution, politicians like David Cameron and Boris Johnson can lie with impunity - even to the Queen - and not face penalties. Police officers can shoot unarmed civilians and not be sent to prison, and planning officers can deceive the Secretaries of State and High Court judges, and not be prosecuted. In effect, there is little justice in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. We aver that such machinations are costing the taxpayer, Treasury and the Crown (being the state) significant sums of money, while adding to the UK's carbon footprint. Hence, the country is not being run effectively by a defective administration.

 

 


There is no Written Constitution for the United Kingdom. But there should be. 

 

The present system denies citizens impartial and effective access to the law with appeals against injustices.

 

The present system provides a mechanism for the state, via police forces and the courts, to obtain SLAPP orders designed to quash the right to freedom of speech and challenges to corruption - most notably planning decisions and banking fraud.

 

All those in the present system become corrupted by associations with secret societies and honours, or peerages. This is a hark back to feudal times, when the king or queen would grant titles and lands in return for support in quelling of the realm and conflicts outside the shore of England.

 

The system is archaic and in urgent need of modernisation. Where the monarchy appears to have lost the ability to secure discrimination free operation of the multiple agencies it employs to do their bidding.

 

 

 

Genocide ratifiction map of the world

 

 

MAP OF RATIFICATION - The civilised world has come together to combat crimes against humanity. Presumably, those countries abstaining either have the intention of conducting ethnic cleansing programmes in the future, or don't much care for the protection of people in their own or other lands. Crimes such as these are dealt with by the International Criminal Court, as per the Rome Statute.

 

 


PROPOSED ENACTMENT OF A WRITTEN CONSTITUTION GUARANTEEING THE RIGHTS OF THE ORDINARY CITIZEN FROM FREEDOM OF STATE PERSECUTIONS

 


...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ENCOMPASSING:

 

1. A

 

2.  B

 

3.  C

 

4.  D

 

5.  E

 

6.  F

 

7.  G

 

8.  H

 

9.  I

 

10. J


...

 

 

WHY WE NEED TO UPDATE THE LAW URGENTLY

The Rome Statute is legislation that governs the International Criminal Court (ICC), established to end impunity of the most serious crimes of concern to the international community such as: war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity and crimes of aggression.

 

To this we would suggest that crimes against humanity should include institutionalised discrimination designed to deprive victims of their rights, to the advantage of competing interests. Such as enjoyment of land and freedom from persecution for challenging corruption. We would see such usurpations as violations of the right to found a family as a watered down eugenics agenda.


 

 

 

CHARITY WATCHDOG INVESTIGATION PRINCE CHARLES'S SCOTTISH VILLAGE - A charity watchdog has launched an investigation into financial transactions used to bail out the Prince of Wales’s struggling eco-village in Scotland.

The Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR) is already examining fundraising practices at the Prince’s Foundation, following allegations that the Prince of Wales' closest former aide co-ordinated with "fixers" over honours nominations for a Saudi billionaire donor.

Michael Fawcett resigned as the foundation's chief executive in November, amid claims he promised to help secure a knighthood and British citizenship for Saudi billionaire Mahfouz Marei Mubarak bin Mahfouz.

Mr Fawcett was involved in directing money from Mahfouz’s foundation to another charity of which the Prince was patron.

Now it can be revealed that the OSCR is also examining the way Lord Brownlow’s Havisham investment group stepped in to buy nine properties at Knockroon in East Ayrshire, where a new development of more than 700 homes was planned along the lines of Poundbury – the Dorset village built to reflect the Prince’s architectural and community values.

Widening scope of the investigation

In its accounts for the year up to March 2021, published last week, the Prince’s Foundation said the OSCR had widened the scope of its probe, stating: “The Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator, in addition to reviewing the Trustee response in relation to the press allegations made against the Foundation, also enquired into certain historical property transactions.”

The sale of the Knockroon properties had been intended to raise millions of pounds needed to restore run down Dumfries House, which Prince Charles acquired in 2007 along with the land for the eco-village, for £45 million, including £20 million borrowed through the Prince’s Foundation.

The sum has long since been paid off, but developers had been struggling to sell even the first phase of 31 houses after they went on sale from 2011, until Lord Brownlow stepped in to buy the nine properties as buy-to-lets and a cafe.

Lord Brownlow was revealed this year to have also partly funded work to refurbish Boris Johnson’s flat at Number 11 Downing Street.

A spokesman for the OSCR told The Telegraph: “We are currently considering all the evidence we have gathered to support our own inquiry into these matters, and are continuing to work with the charity and others before we decide what action, if any, is required in this case.”

The Prince’s Foundation admitted in its accounts that the rows over donations risked damaging its reputation.

In its accounts, the Foundation states: “The findings of the report and the attendant legal advice highlighted a number of areas of risk to the Foundation. The risks identified and considered include the potential for legal, regulatory, employee and reputational risks. The trustees accept the reputational risk arising from these events as probable and note the possible risk of both legal and regulatory liability outcomes.”

Mahfouz has been one of the most prolific donors to Prince Charles’s charities, with the Mahfouz Wood at the 15th-century Castle of Mey named after him. The castle was formerly the Queen Mother’s home and is now one of the Prince’s Scottish residences.

Mahfouz’s donations of more than £1.5 million helped to fund renovations of residences used by the Prince, and other charitable ventures.

Clarence House has said that the Prince had “no knowledge of the alleged offer of honours or British citizenship on the basis of donation to his charities”.

The Prince’s Foundation would not comment specifically on the OSCR’s examination of transactions relating to Lord Brownlow, but in a statement Dame Sue Bruce, chair of its board of trustees, said it was considering the findings of the watchdog’s investigations.

She has previously said: “The board of trustees is determined that lessons will be learned to ensure that, in future, our charity maintains the highest standards in all areas and always acts with the utmost integrity and probity.”

 

 

 

..

 

 

LINKS & REFERENCE

 

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/charity-watchdog-investigating-transactions-used-to-bail-out-prince-charles-s-scottish-eco-village/ar-AARX61G?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/charity-watchdog-investigating-transactions-used-to-bail-out-prince-charles-s-scottish-eco-village/ar-AARX61G?

 

 

 

 

Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site

 

 

 

This website is provided on a free basis as a public information service. copyright © Climate Change Trust 2021. Solar Studios, BN271RF, United Kingdom.

 

 

THE UK IS RIFE WITH INSTITUTIONAL MALPRACTICES WITHOUT ANY RECORSE IN LAW TO REMEDY SUCH INJUSTICES